By at least one measure, YouTube, Google+, LinkedIn, and Reddit are all dramatically declining in value. According to new research, each site saw its share of Web traffic referrals nosedive over the
In June, “share of visits” -- a percentage of overall traffic, including direct traffic, social referrals, organic search, and paid search, that sites receive
-- for YouTube, Google+ and LinkedIn were 0.06%, 0.06% and 0.02%, respectively.
That’s according to a new report from content discovery and sharing startup Shareaholic, which
sources data from a network of roughly 300,000 opt-in Web sites with what it claims is a combined reach of more than 400,000,000 consumers.
In particular, YouTube and LinkedIn each
saw its share plunge over the past year -- shrinking 82.66% (0.29 percentage points) and 77.43% (0.05 percentage points), respectively.
Google+ fared a little better, losing 19.81% (0.02
percentage points) of its share of traffic year-over-year. On the bright side, YouTube, Google+ and LinkedIn offer the most engaged social media post-click referrals.
social network is only as good as the connections is fosters and supports,” according to Danny Wong, marketing manager at Shareaholic.
What explains the referral failings of
YouTube, Google+, LinkedIn, and Reddit?
For one, for “the majority of marketers and publishers, YouTube is not a significant driver of traffic because not all businesses have
the sufficient resources to develop high-quality videos their audiences want to see and share,” according to Wong. "Making good videos is prohibitively expensive.”
said, “among the few that have developed popular YouTube channels, it’s a traffic gold mine,” Wong notes.
Google+ simply lacks the size or carry the same influence
as competing social platforms, by Shareaholic’s measure.
“Arriving late to the game, Google Plus failed to grow user adoption of the platform since most marketers and
publishers still do not quite understand its value and are likely overwhelmed managing their already claimed and robust Facebook and Twitter accounts,” according to Wong.
LinkedIn, most sites have yet to realize the power of authoring and syndicating content on LinkedIn, by Wong's measure. That, and the site has seen a remarkable decline in share-of-visits,
Industrywide, however, social media is becoming a key driver of Web traffic. The eight largest sources of social referrals drove 31.07% of overall traffic sites
received last month -- nearly double the 15.55% of traffic driven during the same period last year.
In particular, Facebook is absolutely dominating the field.
social giant now drives nearly a quarter (23.39%) of overall traffic to sites, and appears to be just getting started. Over the last year, its “share of traffic” skyrocketed -- up 150.49%
(14.05 percentage points) from 9.34% in June 2013.
By increasing its share 10.09% (2.14 percentage points) from the first through the second quarters of the year, Shareaholic suggests
that Facebook stole share from the seven remaining social networks, which lost a collective 1.97 percentage points.
By its measure, and facebook drives nearly a quarter of overall traffic to sites. What sites, what really is the measure? They have set the yardstick for the measure, and then judge to that measure. Is that measure the reason folks are on one or more of the social networks? Bunk, hocum and nonsense. This sounds more like marketing for Shareaholic, rather than something one could quote as definitive sourcing of the value of a social network. This is looking through the wrong end of the telescope...imho
I agree with Jeffrey on this one. There seems to be something off on the data or the interpretation of said data.
Nonetheless, they got me to go to the Shareaholic site to learn more about them...
My two cents...