The car of the future may be here sooner than many people think and mobility of the future may look different than expected.
One of the most significant effects of the driverless car
of the future will be the different ways that time will be spent in a car along with new revenue streams from in-car advertising, based on a major new study.
The lengthy global report on the
car of the future by Citi GPS identified four major auto industry changes between now and 2030. They are:
- The era of on-demand mobility will reach an inflection point with driverless
and connected vehicles entering the market over the next four to six years. This will yield business models providing autonomous on-demand ridesharing, first in geofenced zones and eventually
beyond.
- Driverless cars will enable new shared-ownership business models, such as subscription services or timeshare approaches.
- The cost of electric vehicles will reach parity
with internal combustion vehicles by 2025. The resulting rise in electric vehicle penetration, safer cars and driverless business models is likely to reduce the cost of personal car ownership.
- Connected cars and big data will enable new revenue and efficiency streams throughout the life of the car. The car becomes a central role in the Internet of Everything.
The
transformation of vehicles will hardly happen overnight.
There are three stages to autonomous vehicles, according to Citi. It starts with geo-fenced ridesharing, followed by ridesharing
everywhere and then automated vehicles being sold to individuals.
The most significant changes coming relate to personal mobility in major cities and surrounding areas.
Citi GPS says
this is where on-demand driverless rideshare networks make the most economic sense from a congestion, parking and pollution perspective.
The anticipated changes will begin with driverless
rideshare networks in geo-fenced zones.
The unlocking of time spent in the car also introduces new business models, such as specialized cars and revenue from advertising, according to the
study.
Projections include new business models for consumers, such as subscription services for autonomous vehicle networks, reduced warranty costs because of over-the-air updates, usage-based
insurance and location-based advertising and coupons.
The study also determined that the four states likely to be the most significant for autonomous vehicles are California, New York ,
Florida and Illinois and the top ranked businesses to be General Motors, Google, Ford and Uber.
The ultimate success of future mobility rests on three pillars, according to Citi. The pillars
are:
- Fully autonomous capability and data. This means achieving state-of-the-art capability in sensing mapping, path panning, driver policy, cybersecurity, redundancy and quality. This
is where regulatory approvals come in.
- Supply and demand matching. This involves ridesharing, with firms such as Uber and Lyft already having an advantage.
- Fleet service and
hardware. For consumers to abandon personal cars and switch to networked mobility, the quality of the vehicles and the servicing of them is critical.
The report does acknowledge the
reality of some consumers’ attachment to their cars.
“There is still something gratifying about owning an asset, and there is clear value in having the instant freedom of mobility
that comes with having your own car,” the report states. “But who needs to own all of it, or any of it? Driverless cars could unlock car timeshare models where people with comparable
schedules could partially own the vehicle — with a dealer in between to ensure proper care by the individual owners. Consumers owning such cars could also lend them to ridesharing networks in
exchange for a fee, helping improve the affordability of personally-owned autonomous cars.”
The study notes that a fully autonomous car also unlocks value for consumers by freeing up
time normally reserved for driving that can now be used for work or media consumption.
One of the major deciding factors for consumers may be cost.
Citi estimates that fully autonomous
cars will be quite a bit more expensive, as in $5,000 to $8,000 more than a car that a person drives.
That may be a high price to pay not to drive.