Facebook Modifies Content Policies

Amid what analysts are calling an unprecedented ad boycott, Facebook has decided to modify its content policies.

Most notably, the social giant will soon begin labeling posts from influential figures that violate its standard content policies.

“We’ll add a prompt to tell people that the content they’re sharing may violate our policies,” Facebook cofounder-CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced in a Friday post.

Of equal significance, Zuckerberg said Facebook will no longer allow what he calls “newsworthiness exemptions” for posts from public figures that incite violence or suppress voting.

“Even if a politician or government official says it, if we determine that content may lead to violence or deprive people of their right to vote, we will take that content down,” Zuckerberg declares.

Under these new terms, President Trump most likely would not have been allowed to use his Facebook account to endorse the shooting of people looting businesses in response to the killing of George Floyd last month.

Initially, Zuckerberg responded to Trump’s threat by reiterating Facebook’s commitment to free expression.

Since then, however, a resulting civil-rights movement has swept the country, while a growing number of critics inside and outside Facebook have called out the company’s refusal to impose stricter content standards on Trump.

At the beginning of the month, hundreds of Facebook employees staged a “virtual walkout” for giving Trump a platform to incite violence and spread disinformation.

Since then, a growing number of advertisers have joined the #StopHateForProfit campaign, which was launched by the NAACP, the Anti-Defamation League and other civil-rights groups.

As of Friday, the list of brand partners committed to boycotting Facebook properties included Unilever, Verizon, Ben & Jerry’s, Eddie Bauer, Magnolia Pictures, Patagonia, The North Face, REI and Upwork.

Escalating the battle between Madison Avenue and the social-media industry, Unilever said it was suspending all U.S. advertising on Facebook properties (and Twitter) for the rest of the year.

Additionally, Zuckerberg said Facebook would now prohibit a wider category of hateful content in advertising.

“Specifically, we’re expanding our ads policy to prohibit claims that people from a specific race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, caste, sexual orientation, gender identity or immigration status are a threat to the physical safety, health or survival of others,” he said.

The policy will also be expanded to better protect immigrants, migrants, refugees and asylum seekers from ads suggesting these groups are “inferior” or expressing contempt, dismissal or disgust directed at them, Zuckerberg added.

Telegraphing this change, Facebook recently took down a number of ads bought by Trump’s reelection campaign, which featured Nazi symbols.

 

3 comments about "Facebook Modifies Content Policies".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Robert Sacco from ROIVENUEâ„¢, June 29, 2020 at 5:38 a.m.

    What a paradox Facebook finds themself in.

    They've developed themselves into one of, if not THE online communication platform. This is great.

    But... now in this position, they must deal with problems like: the balance between hate speech and free speech, it's group platform being a cesspool of misinformation and internet privacy. Not so great.

    Good luck Zuck.

  2. PJ Lehrer from NYU, June 29, 2020 at 11 a.m.

    It's time for Facebook to be held to the same standards as other media outlets...
    http://pjlehrer.blogspot.com/2020/05/a-democracy-is-supposed-to-be-majority.html

  3. Tony Jarvis from Olympic Media Consultancy, June 29, 2020 at 12:20 p.m.

    As he has surely proven consistently, Mr. Zuckerberg is the greatest con man the world has ever seen based on his reported $85 Billion net worth overseeing a communications sewer with FB correctly described as "digital gangsters" by a UK Parliamentary Committee, February 2019. 
    Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act 47 U.S.C. § 230 that provides immunity to social media companies on the internet must be eliminated by Congress and these companies must be required to act as fully responsible publishers based on the same regulations applied to main stream media.

Next story loading loading..