
At a time when the advertising industry is
adopting and/or evaluating a wide range of alternative “currencies” for its ad buys, new research suggests that most of the ones relying on some form of active measurement may not be as
accurate as many believe.
The research being released by the Advertising Research Foundation’s Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement (CIMM), is among the findings coming
out of a study conducted for CIMM by passive media measurement firm HyphaMetrics.
The study, which passively measured the TV viewing of 100 households in the fourth quarter of 2021,
validated its findings with telephone coincidental studies to confirm what people in those households were watching.
What it found was that active measurement systems such as
Nielsen’s people meters -- which require respondents to repeatedly push buttons to confirm their presence and what they are viewing -- “introduce friction” that over time creates
behavioral conditioning, attrition and non-compliance that skews results.
advertisement
advertisement
While a 100-household sample study is not necessarily representative or projectable to the actual viewing
universe, the net finding was that passive measurement does a much better job of detecting actual TV viewing than active measurement methods -- by a margin of more than three to one.
While active measurement methods captured only 22% of TV minutes viewed over the course of the study, passive methods detected 78%.
"Our study found consistently high match
rates for both learning what households are watching on TV as well as which members of the home were viewing, an indication of this technology's ability to passively measure people in a non-intrusive
manner," CIMM Managing Director Jon Watts said in a statement released with the findings.
Watts characterized HyphaMetrics’ “multi-layered persons” approach, which
utilizes a combination of WiFi, Bluetooth and infrared signals to detect the presence of a viewer, as having the “potential to facilitate more precise detection of an individual in relation to
their media exposure.”