Commentary

Legacy Media Consolidation Not The Answer - Or 'Hegemony': Barry Diller

Is consolidation the only way for legacy TV network-centric media companies to survive? 

According to legendary TV and film executive Barry Diller, if this is what you believe, then you're thinking only about egos -- entertainment egos.

For the most part, it comes down to the intersection of quality content and distribution.

Forget about wide access to distribution -- aging linear and fast-moving streaming, as well as all other digital media access. Instead, turn the focus to producing great content for people to watch.

In a recent interview at a Financial Times event, Diller cited concerns that companies have to stop believing they are in a leadership position.

advertisement

advertisement

“Hollywood no longer has that hegemony,” he said, adding: “I don’t mean that the legacy companies are going to go out of business.” 

Companies like Warner Bros. Discovery and others might be going about it the wrong way. 

“What has to do with it is, are you making programs -- movies and television -- products that people want to see? If you’re better than your competitor in doing that, you’ll do OK.”

Diller adds that there are “so many different ways to get your product to an audience” that “if you have a route to distribution, meaning you can get your product out, you’ll do okay.”

Still legacy media just needs to be careful and not tread into those areas that big tech/digital media are in. More importantly, they may have to give up on what they assume is a leadership position.

“What is the definition of the leadership of Hollywood? The definition is that it has moved to technology companies, Netflix, Amazon and Apple. [They] are really the controllers of what I think anybody would call the worldwide film and television business.”

For its part, Warner Bros. Discovery and others have been slowly gravitating toward this -- to be what has been termed an “arms dealer” of sorts -- to become a supplier of high-quality/premium TV shows and films to digital media companies like Netflix, Amazon and Apple.

While many legacy-media companies have made this subtle shift, they are not all in. They are still holding on to their efforts around distribution (linear TV networks, streaming, local TV stations), with gradual financial and business transitions.

To his point, Diller believed he could be a major influencer as part of this change.

Recently he had been considering a possible bid for Paramount Global, believing he had the better approach to right the direction for the company that had been going in the wrong direction for some time.

Diller, a former senior TV and movie executive at Paramount, believed this could have been a return path to where he started in the business.

“I thought of it as a duty rather than a desire. I thought I knew what to do with it.”

What were the specific details of that path? He didn’t say. We get the hint ... it has nothing to do with “hegemony.”



1 comment about "Legacy Media Consolidation Not The Answer - Or 'Hegemony': Barry Diller".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, September 24, 2024 at 3:57 p.m.

    The problem with Barry's suggestion that content producers should  concentrate on making "great" programs that people want to watch is that many times pople watch TV not for "great " programs but just to kill time, or to baby sit, or for the latest news or  simple companionship---and they aren't expecting "great" shows on every channel or streaming library every time they turn the set on.

    Barry's frame of reference is probably prime time, not daytime or late night or the
    weekend afternoons or early in the evening--when consumer needs for  watching TV are different than at 8PM or 9PM. Also what some people think is "great" content may strike others as not worth the bother. And cost enters into the equation. Many content providers can't rationalize the high--and often outlandish fees required by the big name stars or production studios  for "great" programs with their own ROI needs. This painful lesson has only just been learned by the TV networks who vastly overspent on pricy "originals" to lure streaming service subs---only to go deeply in the red as a result. 

    Of course content is important, but so is balancing one's  menu to cater to all of the many viewer needs while at the same time making a profit.  Some "great shows", sure---if you are lucky enough to find them for your use---but don't forget that there are many kinds of consumers and many needs and mindsets to please.

Next story loading loading..