Commentary

Nielsen Dusts Off DMA Concept For A New Generation

A headline on Nielsen's Insights newsletter web page asked this question: “What is a Designated Market Area (DMA), and why does it matter?”

The piece then goes on to explain the concept of DMAs, including how they originated, what they are, and how “hyper-local strategies” can benefit from what is known about regional “audience preferences and behaviors” within these market areas.

I was kind of thunderstruck when I came across this piece. I was surprised to discover that DMAs and their characteristics had apparently fallen by the wayside as a go-to tool for marketers and advertisers, or so it seemed from the article.

The Nielsen Insights article was written in simple terms in the tone of a primer aimed at dusting off -- i.e., “reintroducing” -- the concept to modern-day readers who apparently had never heard or seen the acronym DMA.

advertisement

advertisement

“To cut through the noise, marketers need to embrace hyper-local strategies, recognizing that audience preferences and behaviors can vary dramatically not just between major markets, but even within individual neighborhoods of the same city,” Nielsen tells us.

“One particularly powerful approach is the use of geographically segmented data that goes beyond a national view, diving into specifics of how, when and where different audience segments consume local television content in various markets,” it goes on.

“In the U.S., the media industry often refers to Designated Market Areas (DMAs) -- proprietary geographic regions exclusively defined by Nielsen to represent specific television viewing areas.”

And this, the article seems to imply, is such an unknown concept today that it needs to be reexplained like a freshman intro class -- DMAs 101.

As I understood them, the designation of distinct regional “market areas” started with a consideration of the strengths and contours of broadcast signals and the communities they served all the way out to the limits of their signals.

But more than just signal strength, it was my impression that the designations were also based more or less subjectively on the perceived impact of primary local media on diverse communities within a broadcast station's service area. I do not recall whether the reach of local newspapers was part of the DMA media mix.

This TV Blog is not a criticism of the apparent obscurity and disuse of DMAs today (as I interpret the Insights article).

It is more about how it felt to realize that something I once relied on almost every day to do my work is out of vogue and likely has been for a long time.

As a journalist, but not a marketing professional, there was once a period in my career when I had a great familiarity with the nation’s DMAs, including their names, rankings and the TV and radio stations in many of them, from major to midsized to small.

Then as now, Nielsen's list of Designated Market Areas goes from No. 1, New York City, to No. 210, Glendive, Montana.

I by no means had the list memorized in any way, but I could rattle off many of the DMA names and, more importantly, the major TV and radio stations within them.

I especially took pride in my recall of the many markets in which towns and cities were combined -- Wilkes Barre-Scranton (Pennsylvania, ranked 57th in 2024), Tyler-Longview (Texas, 111th), Flint-Saginaw-Bay City (Michigan, 74th), Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem (North Carolina, 47th) and on and on.

It was an analogue era and information about DMAs came from two printed sources. One was the annual Broadcasting Yearbook put out by Broadcasting magazine.

This weighty tome, about the dimensions of an old phone book, contained information I needed to do the job of covering local TV and radio from New York City.

This information included call letters, network affiliations, ownership (licensees) and management. The latter was especially important because here at my fingertips were the names of the general managers, sales managers, promotion managers and program directors who I needed to reach.

Another source was the series of market-specific guide books put out by SRDS, which stands for Standard Rates and Data Services. Today, New York-based SRDS is part of Adwanted Group.

If memory serves, these SRDS books may have been published quarterly and possibly monthly. In at least one important way, they did the Broadcasting Yearbook one better because the SRDS books not only had the names of management, but also their phone numbers.

This was a great help to journalists, but the books' contact info and information on ad rates were designed primarily for ad buyers seeking access to prospects.

In any case, the TV Blog applauds Nielsen's effort to revive interest in DMAs, a concept as relevant today as it was long ago, for journalists, marketers and media buyers alike.

4 comments about "Nielsen Dusts Off DMA Concept For A New Generation".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Aaron Peterson from Adwanted Group, July 2, 2025 at 11:16 a.m.

    I am the head of marketing for Adwanted US/SRDS - thanks for the SRDS shout-out! You are correct that the SRDS books were originally published quarlerly, starting all the way back in 1919. I began my career on the agency side in 2005 and also use the SRDS books regularly, until the move to SRDS.com. 

    Today, SRDS.com has over 800,000 media contacts across more than 125,000 media listings covering all media types (print, digital, TV, audio, OOH, direct mail, and more) nationally and in local markets. We also still include Nielsen DMA maps for subscribers, as well as a slew of other tools and data for planners and buyers. We also recently launched Local Market Profiles, which provide a comprehensive overview of the audiences and media in each of the 210 US DMAs, to help anyone quickly understand the makeup of local markets. 

  2. Fraser E from Opinions expressed herein are solely my own, July 2, 2025 at 1:40 p.m.

    DMA's are still active currency at every ad agency I'm aware of, but I've been wondering for years now if and when their definition will need to change.  Without checking notes, a DMA is a collection of counties whose preponderance of TV viewing is sourced from that market's stations.  Every county is assigned to a DMA, and only one DMA, and again, it's based on what I'll call "preponderance of viewing".  But in today's world, where broadcast accounts for a distinct minority of viewing, and where local stations' share of streaming viewing may not be readily reported, is the definitiion of DMA still relevant and current?

  3. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, July 2, 2025 at 2:23 p.m.

    Adam, the DMA concept was Nielsen's retort to Arbitron's creation of ADI's--areas of dominant influence  --as a way to define TV markets. It was not based on how far the stations' gignals went  nor anything else--like newspaper circulations or radio station listening--- only the collective viewing  that each markets' TV stations garnered in each county, relative to the same for stations from adjacent markets. Hence, if a county located  in between Cincinnati and Dayton, Ohio,  directed more of its viewing to Cincinnati stations than Dayton stations the county was awarded to Cincinnati--even though the Dayton outlets may have had a fair amount of viewing in that county. 

    The basic issue that the ADIs and DMAs were designed to deal with was the signicifant coverage duplication between stations originating in different markets. By adopting the ADI or DMA concept--both produced essentially the same market definitions --the audience duplication problem was set aside--even though it still existed. And, needless to say, markets with lots of network affiliates and independent stations were favored by the ADI and DMA concepts if they shared coverage with smaller cities that had fewer stations. 

  4. Art Salisch from SMRC, July 2, 2025 at 3:13 p.m.

    Adam, signal strength was more of an issue regarding the creation radio defined areas such as MSA and TSA.    

Next story loading loading..