Commentary

Independent Ad Measurement (Outside Of TV) Is Dead

Most in our industry should care about having independent, trusted third-party measurement anchoring the buying and selling of all advertising in the U.S.

First, the amount of money at stake is enormous; U.S. ad spend will approach half a trillion dollars this year.

Second, advertising’s societal impact is unmatched by any other industry. It not only funds virtually all of our news, information and entertainment, but it is also designed to persuade us to believe, want and do things that we would not otherwise.

Finally, as an intangible asset class, advertising is extraordinarily vulnerable to adulteration, manipulation and misstatement—something actors in our industry (on both sides) are constantly culpable of.

We don’t stand for the widespread distribution of food, gasoline, housing or drugs without independent standards and measurement. We should care as much for how Americans feed their minds, belief systems and emotions each day.

advertisement

advertisement

Unfortunately, most advertising transactions today are and will be bought and sold on self-reported numbers. Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and TikTok today represent 65% of all advertising bought and sold in the U.S. and all of them self-report that vast majority of their ad transactions.

And their collective share of the market is growing, as they rapidly expand into the TV and premium video ad market, a heretofore impregnable bastion, staunchly defended by legacy TV companies.

Except for what they are selling into dedicated linear TV ad budgets, they are living on their own numbers with only cosmetic veneers of verification. 

Given that they see themselves and operate as mass reach direct marketing companies, it’s easy for them to convince themselves that they don’t have to operate in an independently accountable advertising world..

TV advertising, of course, continues to stand separately.

Nielsen survived the onslaught of an “alt measurement movement” of would-be competitors. It fixed key vulnerabilities in its legacy approaches (even if some players aren’t happy) and renewed long-term contracts with its sell-side customers, continuing to be required currency on the vast, vast majority of national TV advertising campaigns. Further, by purchasing DoubleVerify, Nielsen enters the performance optimization market without having to directly play in media activation.

Hopefully, Nielsen will link all of the data that DoubleVerify tags can capture with its enormous top-of-the-funnel audience and publisher measurements, and the data from its TV viewing panel and Big Data platform.

Reach and frequency still matter, particularly if tied to deeper funnel metrics. Brands and retailers need to know how many, how often, when and who of their target customers they are reaching with their commercial communications, and they will need more standardized and more accurate media mix and attribution models instead of the plethora of ones out there now heavily skewed to real-time and super short-term search, social and e-commerce impacts.

What do you think? Is there any independent ad measurement still alive outside of TV?

7 comments about "Independent Ad Measurement (Outside Of TV) Is Dead".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Gordon Borrell from Borrell Associates, August 27, 2026 at 2:13 p.m.

    Yeah, I know of one company used by a range of advertisers, media, agengies, and trade associations to track both TV and the other 90% of ad spending, down to the county level and across 18 different types of media. And rhe data is now on steroids, behind an MCP server. Its why some of the biggest advertising media get bigger. They "see" where that other 90% is coming from.

  2. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, August 27, 2026 at 2:25 p.m.

    Of course, Dave--for other forms of "legacy media"--radio, magazines, newspapers, etc.

    But you are right for  some of streaming and most of the rest--digital audio, social media, You Tube, etc. the sellers provide whatever data they can get away with.

    On the positive side, most of this problem affects non-branding campaigns. A typical branding ad budget consists of 50-65% linear TV plus streaming and about 10-15% in other traditional forms of media--leaving only 20-25% in question re measurement. In contrast, sales promotion buys are very heavily concentrated in digital media which do not provide third party measurement. For search, it may not matter as most search buys charge only for clickthroughs. But for the rest--LOL.

  3. Dave Morgan from Simulmedia replied, August 27, 2026 at 3:31 p.m.

    Gordon, exactly. Without market wide currency, the game moves to proprietary databases and arbitrage.

  4. Dave Morgan from Simulmedia replied, August 27, 2026 at 3:34 p.m.

    Good points Ed, but the digital platforms claim (and charge for) branding value in their banners, newsfeed mentions, web video, social video, audio, podcasts and search. The spend their massively outweighs everything else now.

  5. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, August 27, 2026 at 4:11 p.m.

    That may be, Dave, but such branding "enhancements" are primarily oriented to appeal to sales promotional people for their campaigns, not the brand managers and CMOs who direct the marketers' major branding efforts. In other words, "advertising" has a split personality. The branding side is usually handled by different people --and agencies--than the sales promo function and the latter is increasingly in-house. The objectives are different as are the metrics and thus the need for better auduence measurement. It's far more important for the branding side.

  6. Lubin Bisson from Qzedia Media Inc, August 27, 2026 at 4:27 p.m.

    Extraordinarily vulnerable, Dave.  100% agree.

  7. Howard Shimmel from Janus Strategy & Insights, LLC, August 27, 2026 at 5:02 p.m.

    Dave, agree 100%. I grew up in a fairly open and transparent Linear TV marketplace. We knew our share of viewing, we knew what advertisers ran on competitive networks and not ours. Got to AOL in 2001 and it was so different. So opaque. I had no idea what AOL's share of consumption was. Fast forward 25 years, and things are so much worse. There's not enough discussion about how we operate as an industry without a comprehensive, marketplace view of consumption, ads, spend. There's definitely not enough talk in the industry about this. 

Next story loading loading..