One of the bright sides for the media industry in the current pandemic is that certain legacy media that were being written off as no longer viable -- radio, newspapers and magazines -- are seeing increased usage, especially among younger demographics. That's one of the findings of a new report …
Joe, this is junk research, at least as reported. Your skeptical fourth paragraph is well heeded. Without knowing the bases it is hard to evaluate (e.g. were older demos already listening & reading more, so that a lesser percentage increase could actually mean a greater increase in time?) Also, what does "a melange of original research... third party sources... anecdotal verbatim" mean??? If you are going to report on it at all, I would have liked the headline and first paragraph to be a little more forthcoming about the superficial nature of the info released.
@Tim Brooks:
mé·lange
/māˈlänj/
noun
a mixture; a medley.
Joe, to Tim's point, when one third of the respondents in a study like this claim that they are increasing their use of a particular medium---say radio---this means that two thirds are either not increasing it or are using the medium less---all based on a general impression that is elicited by the survey---not anything that could pass for specifics--- what did you listen to, when and where? etc. If you tried to calculate the net increase that such a study indicates for radio listening and counted the no increase or decrease replies, you might estimate an overall gain if the upside percentage was larger than the downside one---but that's about all. This is hardly a dramatic finding of a huge surge in listening. To infer that you would need much larger percentages claiming that they are increasing their usage than shown in the table.
@Ed Papazian & Tim Brooks: No argument here. That's exactly what we reported.
Frankly, I am embarassed that this came from a media agency.