
Add made-for-advertising (MFA) sites to the
array of data signals the world’s biggest media agencies have begun filtering their programmatic buys for.
At least one, GroupM, has begun integrating signals that identify MFAs in the
bid stream of the programmatic media buys it makes for its clients in order to weed them out.
The move, which follows a damning study released by the Association of National Advertisers in June, which found
advertisers were wasting $13 billion – or about 15% of their programmatic media buys – on low-quality MFA sites, many of which publishing bogus content.
GroupM -- which
already filters bidstream data for other meaningful signals governing brand safety, content quality, carbon impact -- has long been moving toward building its own premium programmatic marketplace via
direct deals with quality publishers, but the new protections are part of an ongoing effort to safeguard clients from unsavory content and low-quality traffic.
advertisement
advertisement
“The challenges
associated with MFA domains are likely to grow even more complex as the media ecosystem continues to evolve rapidly,” notes GroupM Senior Director of Global Investment, Programmatic Rory Latham,
explaining why it is partnering with Jounce Media to filter MFAs out of its programmatic buys.
Jounce scrapes data signals from a variety of sources that enable it to identify
publishers generating patterns such as low-quality traffic indicating they are MPAs.
Importantly, GroupM’s Latham noted that removing MFAs helps GroupM achieve one of its other
programmatic filtering goals: reducing the carbon impact of programmatic buys because MFA sites contribute a significant carbon footprint.
Multiplying the estimated 44,000 MFA
domains cited in the ANA’s report by as many as 35 supply-path connections Jounce estimates that a typical MFA domain executes and adds a lot of carbon to the pipeline.
“If you multiply those numbers, you’re talking about 1.5 million supply paths in a typical campaign,” says GroupM’s Latham.
While a variety of
industry watchdogs – including the Trustworthy Accountability Group
(TAG) and NewsGuard – have recently begun offering their own solutions
for filtering MFA sites in response to the ANA report, GroupM’s deal with Jounce is believed to be the first internal solution by a major agency holding company.