MRC Releases Second Phase Of OOH Standards, Includes 'Comparability' With Other Media

The Media Rating Council (MRC) this morning released a draft of "Phase 2" of its controversial out-of-home media audience-measurement requirements for a 30-day public comment period before they are ratified as the U.S. ad industry's standard.

Phase 2, which can be read here, adds requirements for measuring the demographic -- or persons-based -- audience exposure to out-of-home media, building on Phase 1, which only established standards for counting out-of-home media audience impressions.

Phase 1, which was released in April, can be read here.

advertisement

advertisement

Importantly, the Phase 2 standards also provide "comparability to other measured media" (see chart above), which some believe will help out-of-home media compete on more of an even playing field with other higher-priced ad-supported media.

Key elements of the Phase 2 requirements include:

Evidence of "likelihood-to-see" (LTS) required for audience qualification such as considerations in the following areas:

  • Size of the asset (minimum apparent size)
  • Environmental and visual obstruction
  • Presence of audio
  • Precise location of the asset
  • Dynamic nature of the asset
  • Visual clutter
  • Visual attractiveness
  • Illumination and seasonality
  • Exposure time
  • Speed, direction and mode of travel
  • Audience characteristics

Requirements for the use of LTS thresholds

Deterministic data use requirements including:

  • Representative nature of data
  • Robust and sufficient coverage
  • Recency and staleness policies
  • Granularity

Empirical support requirements

Quality control over data sources

Model selection and support

Disclosures

Comments on the draft, which will be accepted through August 27, can be submitted via email to MRC at rpinelli@mediaratingcouncil.org

2 comments about "MRC Releases Second Phase Of OOH Standards, Includes 'Comparability' With Other Media".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Tony Jarvis from Olympic Media Consultancy, July 29, 2025 at 6:39 p.m.

    Joe: As you likely surmised from your "controversial" comment, this MRC Phase II OOH measurement document will surely continue the damage to the true value of OOH media from Phase I as eloquently revealed by Kym Frank, former GeoPath President, and my "In Dissent" Op Ed in Media Post - we were both members of the MRC Working Group.  It, delibertely I suggest, confuses and/or contradicts many of the key principles, definitions, methododologies, and best practices in OOH Measurement long embraced by the majority of OOH JICs globally via the WOO Global OOH Audience Measuerment Guidelines, May 2022.  
    Phase I was found to be almost farcical at a meeting of OOH JICs from around the world after it was released and subject to a more thorough assessment of this Phase II document, I would posit that any assessment of Phase II by the international OOH research cognoscente would not change.  
     

  2. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, July 30, 2025 at 6:14 a.m.

    Tony, as we both know, the sellers want big numbers and that's why all of this is oriented towards OTS--"opportunity to see"---not actually seeing the ads. If the MRC was focused on ad attentivensss would the sellers accept that and willingly support ongoing measurements to provide the needed data? I tend to doubt that. As for the advertisers--all concerned with their own issues not the industry's wellfare as a whole--do we think that they will step up and demand change? How would this be organized? Who would lead it? What kind of pressure would be applied? 

Next story loading loading..