Washington Post publisher Katharine Weymouth apologized to readers yesterday for a derailed plan to host a series of off-the-record, sponsored dinners at her home to which Obama administration
officials, lawmakers, lobbyists, business leaders, and
Post editors and reporters would be invited. The plan "exploded in controversy," Paul Farhi reports, after a promotional flier described
selling sponsorships of $25,000 for each dinner -- or as much as $250,000 for a series of 11 dinners -- surfaced and was featured in a Politico.com story.
Weymouth took responsibility for
the mess but said that a recently hired marketing executive had sent out the flier without approval, and that planning for the July 21 event was done in too much haste.
Critics accused
the
Post of abusing its journalistic integrity and of attempting to profit from selling access. In interviews, Weymouth and
Post Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli told Farhi that the
long-standing plan for the dinners was to have multiple sponsors so that a single sponsor would not be perceived as controlling or influencing the discussion.
Tom Rosenstiel, director of
the Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism, says attracting multiple sponsors misses the point of the controversy. "Their first obligation is to make information public and to inspire public debate
and discussion. ... In this case, the
Washington Post would be arranging events that only insiders have access to and profiting from those events.
advertisement
advertisement
"
Read the whole story at Washington Post »