Amid reports that Facebook is finally ready to debut its Foursquare killer, er, location-based "check-in" feature, attention has shifted to the 800-pound gorilla in the room: Google's
Latitude.
Largely ignored by industry pundits until now, the search giant's location-based service has some 8 million registered users, 3 million of whom are presently
"active." Compare that to Foursquare's measly million-odd users, and MyTown's roughly 2 million.
"Latitude is not dead," Google's Steve Lee
said Thursday on an industry panel, according to
TechCrunch. Translation, according to TechCrunch: "Hey Foursquare
and MyTown, suck it."
According to Lee, Latitude has grown 30% per month each month this year so far, which is largely attributed to the strong growth of Google's
Android mobile operating system. Over 10% of all Android users are using Latitude, said Lee, which, while notable, still leaves plenty of room for growth.
Similarly, Lee
blames poor iPhone support for Latitude's failure to capture the imaginations of even more users -- and industry wonks.
Adds TechCrunch: "While he wouldn't
specifically speak to Google's plans, Lee also hinted that Latitude would soon have a check-in component."
Meanwhile, Martin May, co-founder of location-based
service Brightkite, suggested Thursday during the same panel that the industry should work together on an open database of location data,
Venture Beat reports.
Not surprisingly, Google's Lee shot
down the idea, "saying that there are tremendous technical challenges to building an open, uniform database for everyone to use," Venture Beat reports. "Not only that, there are major
licensing issues to resolve before this kind of step could be taken."
Bigger picture, the popularity of Latitude in the face of various challenges, "just goes to
show you how many people don't care about privacy," notes
The Register. "Latitude doesn't just
share your location with friends, it shares it with Google -- which is already collecting so much else about everything you do."
Read the whole story at TechCrunch et al. »