Commentary

The Future Of Social Media: Is It Branding?

Where do you think the future of social media lies?  Is it in the world of branding, or is it the world of direct response, lead-gen, cost-per-acquisition-type marketing?

The bigger picture of the future of online media frames my answer.  The future of online media is most definitely rooted in brand marketing.  To date, digital media -- specifically online, has been an action-based marketing vehicle, driving activity such as clicks and conversions. But for the business to mature and evolve it HAS to be able to deliver brand metrics and apply them successfully.  

We already see this transition in mobile and online video, where marketers realize that it’s not just about clicks, but also targeted exposure, awareness, consideration and intent.  That understanding of how to use these aspects of digital media is starting to influence traditional digital banners and ad units.  Brands are seeing that it’s important to about building frequency in the eyes of the target audience, and eliminate wasted impressions against those people you are not interested in speaking to.  These metrics, reach and frequency, are coupled with impact and engagement to create metrics that brands can apply to all their marketing campaigns regardless of vehicle, and generate understanding of how consumers become customers.

If this is the case -- and there’s definitely lots of data that support my points -- then it’s logical to think that social media is going to become a valuable branding tool very soon. 

Currently marketers are mixed on how to use social, with too many people not valuing  impressions because they don’t have the proper evaluation metrics in place to create an apples-to-apples comparison.  Social media impressions, or conversational media impressions, are difficult to value vs. traditional TV impressions, print impressions or even standard online impressions.

 The missing factor in this comparison is an industry standard for impact and engagement.  How engaging are TV, print or traditional online vs. social media impressions?   How engaging are consumer-to-consumer impressions in social media vs. the brand-to-consumer impressions that take place on Facebook’s news feed or in a standard eCRM effort?  What metrics can we put in place that will create an industry standard for measuring and comparing these vehicles?

These questions are ones that will be answered absolutely over the next two to three years, as the business matures.  Unfortunately, my prediction is the answers will be categorical in nature, with very little of a  cross-industry standard capable of being put in place.  For example, one of the most important questions to be asked so far is, what is the value of a social media fan or follower?  That question has not been answered to any comfort level, with the response ranging from $3 to $113, depending on the source.

The true answer, I suspect, is “It depends.” It depends on the category of product or service, as well as the depth of engagement that takes place between a brand and its fans.  If the brand utilizes its social platform in an economical, engagement-driven manner, then the value can be high.  If a brand uses its social platform in an excessive, broadcast-centric manner with no true value exchange taking place, then the value is low.  It’s not dissimilar to the way that a brand uses eCRM and email: If you blitz your audience, then they become numb or disinterested, and the value declines.  If you hit them economically and offer something of value, the return can be high!

So the long-winded answer to the question, in my eyes, is that social will definitely be considered a branding vehicle as it moves ahead.  There are certainly some marketers and agencies looking at it now as a lead gen or response-driven medium, but that view is short-sighted and doesn’t place a value on the word-of-mouth component that social can provide -- nor does it take into account the targeted nature of the self-selected audience social reaches. 

Do you agree?   Let me know on the Spin Board!

3 comments about "The Future Of Social Media: Is It Branding?".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Steve Goldner from DivorceForce, October 12, 2011 at 11:40 a.m.

    Great article and excellent points. Social media should "execute" as a brand marketing, BUT we need to show value like a performance marketer. The approach is capture in the post "Social Media Model That Defines the End of the World as We Know It" at http://socialsteve.wordpress.com/2011/10/02/social-media-model-that-defines-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/

    Thanks for hitting a topic that requires much attention!

    Best,
    Steve Goldner
    Senior Director, Social Media
    MediaWhiz

  2. Rodney Brooks from ToTouch One, Inc, October 12, 2011 at 12:01 p.m.

    What I got from this article is simple; don't yell at or preach to people - just inform and teach people and they will follow your brand.

  3. Brandon Evans from Crowdtap, October 14, 2011 at 7:09 p.m.

    Great article Cory. I actually co-authored a report with Joanna Seddon the former CEO of Millard Brown's consulting practice where we defined a new metric called Brand Influence that was created to solve exactly this problem. With Brand Influence we created a methodology where we coud track any marketing activity by not just qualitative numbers (reach/impressions/engagements) but also the quality of those activities mainly the time spent, trust/relevance of the vehicle delivering the message and the enjoyability and memorability of that vehicle channel. Here is the Fast Company right up on our work which also includes a link to the full report. Would love to chat with you sometime about it.

    http://www.fastcompany.com/1771069/eyeballs-obsolete%3F-measuring-brand-influence-in-age-of-social-media

Next story loading loading..