Industry Leaders Discuss TV, Facebook At Social Summit

VaynerchukThe Wall Street Journal and Fox Broadcasting are "fundamentally out of business," and Facebook as a platform will eventually rival today's Internet in both scale and breadth. Those were just two of the bolder statements thrown around at SocComm: The Social Communications Summit in New York on Tuesday.

It was Gary Vaynerchuk, founder and host of the popular video blog Wine Library TV, who predicted the untimely death for Rupert Murdoch's prized media assets. Why?

"The gatekeepers are dead ... platforms are dead," Vaynerchuk said. "Content providers are going to fundamentally win."

In less than three years, with no help from entrenched industry gatekeepers, Vaynerchuk has built an audience of roughly 80,000 viewers for his daily podcasts. Still, despite his unique success, official (and unofficial) gatekeepers in attendance were quick to challenge Vaynerchuk's assumptions.

"TV is still pretty profitable, and not dead by a long shot," said Kenny Miller, EVP of MTV Networks Global Digital Media group--who, for the record, said he sees neither himself or MTV as a "gatekeeper."

"The idea that every content creator is going to go out there and fund their own show, I think, is unrealistic," Miller added.

Even Steven Greenberg--who left his post as president of Columbia Records in 2007 to head up the Web-centric music label S-Curve Records--made the case for traditional talent management and media models.

"Some violinists are really great, but they are horrible entrepreneurs," said Greenberg. What's more, "Columbia and others are still content owners," he said. "There is still room for collaboration."

Along those same lines, Greenberg predicts that YouTube--along with video, a popular source for music among consumers--will eventually split ad revenue with record labels. "The (content) owners will be getting a half-penny per stream," he said.

But who predicted that Facebook will someday rival the scale and breadth of today's World Wide Web? David Kirkpatrick, senior editor of Fortune, who added that Facebook's present position at the head of all social media is not up for debate. "Facebook absolutely dominates social media right now," he said.

Estimating that Facebook now has nearly 175 million active users--up from just 65 million in May--Kirkpatrick offered multiple reasons for the network's success. Its creators are obsessed with great products and insist on changing the network's structure to facilitate continued growth. Also critical has been Facebook's insistence that members interact using their real identities, which, according to Kirkpatrick, has made for a more ethical--and thus less hostile--community environment.

There is also the matter of good timing and plain luck. For example: "Starting at Harvard was an amazing piece of luck," said Kirkpatrick, because it lent a certain cachet to the brand.

According to Kirkpatrick, two key challenges stand in between Facebook and total world dominance: Google--along with lesser-known social rivals--and the matter of member privacy.

"Facebook has a serious privacy issue that could get out of hand," he said with regard to a member's inability to effectively control the use of their image, behavior, and identity throughout the network.

2 comments about "Industry Leaders Discuss TV, Facebook At Social Summit".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Robert Gourley from Mojave Interactive, February 11, 2009 at 6:14 p.m.

    I believe we will continue to see brands that act as "gatekeeper" fall by the wayside; there are just too many choices for consumers to stay loyal if the brand is only interested in a one-way conversation.

    I don't think it's all doom and gloom for brands like MTV, however. If they focus on what the brand stands for and how those principals can be activated online, they can continue to grow. If they clutch to the old one-way model, top-down they could go the way of the record companies.

  2. Rich Reader from WOMbuzz, February 11, 2009 at 10:34 p.m.

    I concur with Mr. Gourley that it's not all doom and gloom for the brands. However, if they take the attitude that content creators must wait for digital media agencies and networks to intermediate brand partnerships on their behalf, then they will have poisoned the well of consumer good will, and be seen as arrogant and ineffective curators of consumer principles, concerns, interests, actions, needs, and wants.

    The bottom line is that it's up to the brands to use better judgment about who is filtering advice to them and why.

    http://richreader.blogspot.com/2009/01/rules-and-roles-for-brands-to.html

Next story loading loading..