"Google's approach to advertising, to use contextual and targeted advertisements, has been hugely
profitable for the company," writes Mashable. "Where advertising can go to the next level is when real-time geolocation targeting
can take place ... Location is the holy grail of targeted advertising."
Indeed, for some industry watchers, Mayer's appointment confirms what they have long suspected: That
location, location, location is truly the 'next big thing.'
"Location is a key factor in the future of search, social, commerce, and media, among a lot of other things," insists Federated Media founder John Battelle. "Once someone can declare where they are, they add extraordinary context
to both search and social, and to their expectations of what a search or a social connection might yield ... Local is the most important signal to emerge in the database of intentions since the link."
How much money is in play on the local front? Citing data from consulting firm BIA/Kelsey, The New York Times reports: "Local businesses are expected to spend $35.2 billion on online
advertising in 2014, up from $19.6 billion this year."
What's Google next move in the space?
Well, while it's more likely a case of innocent exploration than M&A
research, TechCrunch notes that Mayer has been active on Foursquare of late.
Meanwhile, a source tells The
Times that Google hopes to turn local search on its head, by "answering people's questions before they ask them."
LBS is the next logical step. However I don't feel that location alone is the holy grail. Without including contextual and behavioral insight into the consumers experience location alone isn't enough.
Example: The other night I was eating at a restaurant and a Starbucks offer came up. Couple of issues - I don't like Starbucks coffee and I wasn't interested in drinking it at 9:00 PM at night.
Regardless, the news is good to hear.
Boy, is that begging to be controlled building steam or what?