'Soda Taxes' Pass In All Four Cities With Proposals On Ballots

All four cities that had proposals on their ballots to levy taxes on sugary beverages passed those initiatives, bringing the total of U.S. cities with such taxes to six.

San Francisco, Oakland and Albany, Calif., approved one-cent-per-ounce taxes, reports Sibling Bay Area city Berkeley already had a one-cent tax. 

Boulder, Colo., passed a stiffer, two-cent-per-ounce tax on Tuesday. In June, Philadelphia passed a 1.5-cent-per ounce tax on both sugar-sweetened and diet beverages (a legislative compromise), which is set to be implemented Jan. 1. 

In September, the American Beverage Association (ABA), which reportedly spent $5 million on advertising to fight the tax in Philly, filed a suit seeking to have the tax declared unlawful.



In general, the initiatives are structured as taxes on beverage distributors, which are than expected to pass the taxes on to retailers, who are in turn expected to pass them onto consumers, notes Mother Jones. “The industry is using that structure to call the proposals ‘grocery taxes,’ claiming that retailers will use them as an excuse to jack up prices across the board, negating their impact on soda sales. 

Since 2009, the ABA, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have spent at least $67 million to defeat sugar-added beverages taxes and health warning labels in 19 cities and states, according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

But the tide may be starting to turn — and not only because a growing number of studies are showing that taxes can be an effective way to tamp down the sugary beverages consumption that contributes to obesity, diabetes and heart disease and their associated public costs.

In addition, “Increasingly, states and municipalities are looking at sugar-sweetened beverages the same way they eyed tobacco in the 1980s and 1990s: as a source for additional tax revenue,” Bloomberg BNA noted this week.

The next big battleground is Illinois’s Cook County, including Chicago — which is considering a one-cent tax, notes Mother Jones. And this time, Michael Bloomberg, who lost his bid to restrict the serving sizes of sugar-added beverages when he was New York City’s mayor, is funding a $1 billion ad campaign in support of a Cook County soda tax, reported Crain’s Chicago Business.

1 comment about "'Soda Taxes' Pass In All Four Cities With Proposals On Ballots ".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. R. M. from self, November 10, 2016 at 1:39 p.m.

    If the taxes are supposed to be on "sugar-sweetened beverages" then why is there soda tax on diet sodas with out sugar (ie no calorie) versions? Purported "fruit juice" has more sugar, natural and plenty more "added" kinds. Does the tax move next to the ingredients: packaged baking sugar, molasses, honey, etc?

    What is missing is the EDUCATION of why the product I bad for health + alternate choices to make. The $$$$$ increase of an item is only part of the story… the lame part, as prices for most items in life seem to go up. (Food, at the moment, is the only daily cost that seems to have dropped a slight bit).

    When you have 20 things in a shopping cart, the relative cost increase the cost increase message is nonexistent. Add to the shopping experience…simultaneous mobile phone usage & screaming toddlers tugging at you and you have made no connection between health and food. Just the price of the whole cart at check out.

Next story loading loading..