Commentary

Size Matters

mobile tag

Recently I saw more data documenting increasing use of mobile devices to access social networks. This time around the data is from comScore, which found that the number of visits to Facebook via mobile browsers increased 112% over the last year, while visits to Twitter via mobile devices increased 347%. In terms of raw numbers, these figures represent an increase from 11.8 million mobile access users in January 2009 to 25.1 million in January 2010 for Facebook, and an increase from 1 million to 4.7 million for Twitter over the same period.

Clearly mobi-social networking is appealing to the tech-savvy, on-the-go demographics that dominate social networks and smartphone adoption. But what about the advertising? Setting aside the fact that both networks are still tweaking their ad models, I'm wondering how they can handle the challenge of delivering ads to users on mobile devices -- specifically, how they will address the basic issue of visibility.

The screen sizes of Blackberry devices range from about 2.4 inches to 3.25 inches, measured on the diagonal, while the iPhone's screen measures about 3.5 inches on the diagonal, yielding total screen areas ranging from 5-10 square inches for smart phones in general. It's one thing to imagine delivering display or search results alongside content when the user is engaged in mostly passive consumption of media, but in the more interactive context of social networking, this is not a whole lot of space to work with, especially on the iPhone, where the screen is also the sole interface.

Now, I will admit I am basing this judgment on my personal experience. For some reason my fingers just seem to be more stubby and awkward than other people's, so I find smart phone interfaces (both touch screen and key pad) hard to use to begin with; if I try to compose an email or send a message on a social network, I end up looking like a bear trying to change a watch battery. But even my more nimble, dexterous peers confess the smart phone interfaces sometimes give them trouble too, especially during high-interactivity tasks.

One possibility that various mobile media distributors have been experimenting with is the roadblock ad, which could appear before the social network session, leaving the rest of the interface ad-free. Obviously roadblock ads are kind of annoying, but is there a better option out there? One thing's for sure: if people start feeling that ads are crowding out their mobile access to social networking, you risk a backlash against both the social networks and any advertiser who commits this blunder.

3 comments about "Size Matters".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Lisa Foote from MixMobi, March 9, 2010 at 4:04 p.m.

    Erik - I agree: mobile is quite different. Marketers who continue to treat it the same as the desktop are going to continue to blunder.
    VC Fred Wilson and Brian Solis envision a "golden triangle" of social + mobile + realtime. This is where the leverage is, not in figuring out how to better place a desktop-style banner ad.
    Over time, marketers will figure out ways to insert their messages authentically in the context of realtime conversations in social venues. Then it will seem less like mobile "advertising," and more like realtime conversation participation.

  2. Roger Wilson from The Conference Department, Inc., March 9, 2010 at 4:17 p.m.

    The image is not the only size that matters. With numbers like 25.1 million mobile users and growing, Facebook is winning the network size race. The essential power of media is the power of one-to-many. The bigger the audience that reads the article, hears the song, or sees the image, the more powerful—and profitable that media creation can become. Even if mobile is just a source of content, all the people tuning in to bigger screens to see the pics their pals just loaded are going to see ads.

  3. Howie Goldfarb from Blue Star Strategic Marketing, March 10, 2010 at 9:15 a.m.

    The can't send ads into the live streams because no one is going to see them. And push Advertising to Mobile Web is ok since it is sent to Browsers as it is, but not outside of that. As I have said 20 gazillion times Twitter and Facebook have the wrong business model. They should be advertising free subscription services. My guess is Facebook could get 100-200 million users to pay $2 per month if they remove advertising and protect privacy. That would be the equivalent of instantly increasing revenue 4-8x. Zuckerberg is not very smart nor are his VC backers.

Next story loading loading..